Each conclusion to each of the five major discourses in Matthew begins with the same formula statement: literally "and it happened" (Gr. kai egeneto) followed by a finite verb. It Isaiah , therefore, "a self-conscious stylistic device that establishes a structural turning point." [1] Each conclusion is also transitional and prepares for the next section. [source][source][source]
We learn for the first time that even though Jesus was teaching His disciples ( Matthew 5:1-2) multitudes were listening in to what he taught them. Probably for this reason the end of the Sermon contains more material that is suitable for a general audience. France believed that all the discourses in Matthew are anthologies of Jesus" teachings on various occasions that Matthew compiled into discourses rather than single discourses that Jesus delivered on individual occasions. [2] This is a minority opinion, but it is probably true that the Gospel writers edited Jesus" teachings to some extent. [source][source][source]
Jesus" "teaching" included both His content and His delivery. What impressed the crowds was Jesus" authority. This is the first occurrence of another theme that Matthew stressed ( Matthew 8:9; Matthew 9:6; Matthew 9:8; Matthew 10:1; Matthew 21:23-24; Matthew 21:27; Matthew 28:18). Jesus" authority was essentially different in that He claimed to be the Messiah. He not only claimed to interpret the Word of God, as other contemporary teachers did, but He claimed to fulfill it as well ( Matthew 5:17). He would be the One who would determine entrance into the kingdom ( Matthew 7:21), and He would judge humankind eventually ( Matthew 7:23). He also claimed that His teaching amounted to God"s Word ( Matthew 7:24; Matthew 7:26). Therefore the authoritative note in His teaching was not primarily His sincerity, or His oratorical style, or His lack of reference to earlier authorities. It was who He was. He claimed to be the authoritative interpreter of the Word of God. [source][source][source]
"In the final analysis . . . what Jesus says about the law applies to it as something being authoritatively reinterpreted by his teaching. It is not the Mosaic law in and of itself that has normative and abiding character for disciples, but the Mosaic law as it has passed through the crucible of Jesus" teaching." [3][source]
Scholars have noted many parallels between Jesus" teaching in the Sermon on the Mount and Rabbinic instruction, probably more than in any other part of the New Testament. The similarities, however, lie in form of expression, subject matter, and turn of words, but definitely not in spirit. [4][source]
"The King has proclaimed the nearness of the kingdom and has authenticated that message with great signs. With people flocking to Him He instructs His disciples concerning the character of those who shall inherit the kingdom. The kingdom, though earthly, is founded on righteousness. Thus the theme of His message is righteousness." [1][source]
Jesus proceeded to demonstrate His authority by performing powerful miracles that liberated captives from their bondage, signs that the Old Testament prophets said Messiah would perform. [source][source][source]
"Throughout the rest of his story, Matthew makes it exceedingly plain that, whether directly or indirectly, the issue of authority underlies all the controversies Jesus has with the religious leaders and that it is therefore pivotal to his entire conflict with them." [6][source]