Exodus 19:16-25

Exodus 19:16-25

[16] And it came to pass on the third  day  in the morning,  that there were thunders  and lightnings,  and a thick  cloud  upon the mount,  and the voice  of the trumpet  exceeding  loud;  so that all the people  that was in the camp  trembled.  [17] And Moses  brought forth  the people  out of the camp  to meet  with God;  and they stood  at the nether  part of the mount.  [18] And mount  Sinai  was altogether on a smoke,  because  the LORD  descended  upon it in fire:  and the smoke  thereof ascended  as the smoke  of a furnace,  and the whole mount  quaked  greatly.  [19] And when the voice  of the trumpet  sounded  long,  and waxed louder  and louder,  Moses  spake,  and God  answered  him by a voice.  [20] And the LORD  came down  upon mount  Sinai,  on the top  of the mount:  and the LORD  called  Moses  up to  the top  of the mount;  and Moses  went up.  [21] And the LORD  said  unto Moses,  Go down,  charge  the people,  lest they break through  unto the LORD  to gaze,  and many  of them perish.  [22] And let the priests  also, which come near  to the LORD,  sanctify  themselves, lest the LORD  break forth  upon them. [23] And Moses  said  unto the LORD,  The people  cannot  come up  to mount  Sinai:  for thou chargedst  us, saying,  Set bounds  about the mount,  and sanctify  it. [24] And the LORD  said  get thee down,  and thou shalt come up,  thou, and Aaron  with thee: but let not the priests  and the people  break through  to come up  unto the LORD,  lest he break forth  upon them. [25] So Moses  went down  unto the people,  and spake  unto them.

What does Exodus 19:16-25 Mean?

Contextual Meaning

God again used the symbol of fire to reveal Himself on this mountain ( Exodus 3:2-5). Fire is a symbol of His holiness that enlightens, purges, and refines. The smoke and quaking that accompanied the fire further impressed this awesome revelation on the people.
The priests referred to ( Exodus 19:22; Exodus 19:24) were evidently young men (first-born?) that offered sacrifices before God appointed the Aaronic priests to this service (cf. Exodus 24:5).
Comparative ancient Near Eastern studies have revealed that the covenant form and terminology that God used to communicate His agreement with Israel were common in Moses" day. There were two basic types of formal covenants in the ancient Near East: parity (between equals) and suzerainty (between a sovereign and his subjects). The Mosaic Covenant was a suzerainty treaty. Such agreements characteristically contained a preamble ( Exodus 19:3), historical prologue ( Exodus 19:4), statement of general principles ( Exodus 19:5 a), consequences of obedience ( Exodus 19:5-6 a), and consequences of disobedience (omitted here). In1977 , Kenneth Kitchen wrote the following.
"Some forty different [1] treaties ... are known to us, covering seventeen centuries from the late third millennium BC well into the first millennium BC, excluding broken fragments, and now additional ones still to be published from Ebla." [2]
Thus the form in which God communicated His covenant to Moses and Israel was undoubtedly familiar to them. It enabled them to perceive better the nature of the relationship into which they were entering. [3]
The Mosaic Law consisted of three classes of requirements: those governing moral life (the Ten Commandments), those governing religious life (the ceremonial ordinances), and those governing civil life (the civil statutes). The commandments expressed the righteous will of God ( Exodus 20), the judgments governed Israel"s social life ( Exodus 21:1 to Exodus 24:11), and the ordinances determined Israel"s religious life ( Exodus 24:12 to Exodus 31:18). God gave the whole Law specifically for the nation of Israel ( Exodus 19:3). It is very important to recognize how comprehensive the Mosaic Law was and not limit it to the Ten Commandments. The rabbis, after Maimonides, counted613commands, 248 positive and365 negative, in the law. Maimonides was a Jewish philosopher and exegete who lived in the twelfth century A.D. and wrote Sepher Mitzvoth ("Book of the Commandments"), the definitive Jewish list of laws in the Penteateuch. [4]
There were three categories of law in Israel.
1.Crimes were actions that the community prohibited under the will of God and punished in its name. Murder ( Exodus 21:12), adultery ( Leviticus 20:10; Deuteronomy 22:22), and the kidnapping of persons for sale outside Israel ( Exodus 21:16) are examples of crimes. These offenses resulted in the punishment of the guilty party by the community as a community ( Exodus 21:12-16).
2.Torts were civil wrongs that resulted in an action by the injured party against the party who had wronged him. Assault ( Exodus 21:18-27), the seduction of an unmarried or betrothed girl ( Exodus 22:16-17), and theft of animals or other property ( Exodus 22:1-4) are examples of torts. Conviction resulted in the guilty party paying damages to the injured party ( Exodus 21:18-27).
3.Family law did not involve the courts, but the head of the household administered it in the home. Divorce ( Deuteronomy 24:1-4), the making of slavery permanent ( Exodus 21:1-6), and adoption (cf. Genesis 15:2; Genesis 30:3; Genesis 48:5; Genesis 48:12; 2 Samuel 7:14; Psalm 2:7) are examples. In these cases the head of the household acted unilaterally. He did not, however, have the power of life or death. [5]
God gave the Mosaic Law to the Israelites for several purposes:
1.To reveal the holiness of God ( 1 Peter 1:15) 2.To reveal the sinfulness of man ( Galatians 3:19) 3.To reveal the standard of holiness required of those in fellowship with God ( Psalm 24:3-5) 4.To supervise physical, mental, and spiritual development of redeemed Israelites until they should come to maturity in Christ ( Galatians 3:24; Psalm 119:71-72) 5.To be the unifying principle that made the establishment of the nation possible ( Exodus 19:5-8; Deuteronomy 5:27-28) 6.To separate Israel from the nations to become a kingdom of priests ( Exodus 19:5-6; Exodus 31:13) 7.To make provision for forgiveness of sins and restoration to fellowship ( Leviticus 1-7) 8.To make provision for a redeemed people to worship by observing and participating in the yearly festivals ( Leviticus 23) 9.To provide a test whether one was in the kingdom (theocracy) over which God ruled ( Deuteronomy 28) 10.To reveal Jesus Christ.
J. Dwight Pentecost concluded his article on the purpose of the Law, from which I took the preceding10 points, by pointing out the following.
". . . there was in the Law that which was revelatory of the holiness of God...." There was also "... that in the Law which was regulatory." [6]
"It is extremely important to remember that the Law of Moses was given to a redeemed people, not to redeem a people." [3]
". . . it is also possible that the Pentateuch has intentionally included this selection of laws for another purpose, that Isaiah , to give the reader an understanding of the nature of the Mosaic Law and God"s purpose in giving it to Israel. Thus it is possible to argue that the laws in the Pentateuch are not there to tell the reader how to live but rather to tell the reader how Moses was to live under the law.
"This understanding of the purpose of the laws in the Pentateuch is supported by the observation that the collections of laws in the Pentateuch appear to be incomplete and selective. The Pentateuch as such is not designed as a source of legal action. That the laws in the Pentateuch are incomplete is suggested by the fact that many aspects of ordinary community life are not covered in these laws." [8]
A movement that has gained some followers, especially in the United States, is the Christian Reconstruction movement, also known as the theonomy movement, and the Chalcedon school. Its central thesis is that God intended the Mosaic Law to be normative for all people for all time. Its advocates look forward to a day when Christians will govern everyone using the Old Testament as the law book. Reconstructionism rests on three foundational points: presuppositional apologetics, theonomy (lit. the rule of God), and postmillennialism. The main flaw in this system, from my perspective, is failure to distinguish God"s purposes for Israel from His purposes for the church. [4]
"Theonomy used to be an attractive lens through which to read Scripture for many Christians, particularly in Reformed and Pentecostal circles in the1970s and into the1990s, among those who looked with horror at the secularization of society and longed for a more powerful Christian influence. Fortunately, as we begin the twenty-first century this movement has lost significant influence." [5]6